Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer Using an Intrauterine Manipulator: Is It a Bias for Frozen Section Analysis? Case-Control Study

Study ObjectiveTo evaluate whether the systematic use of an intrauterine manipulator influences the accuracy of frozen section analysis in early-stage endometrial cancer.DesignCase-control study (Canadian Task Force classification II-1).PatientsThree hundred fourteen consecutive women with early-stage endometrial cancer.InterventionsBetween January 2004 and December 2009, 314 women with early-stage endometrial cancer underwent staging at laparoscopy (case group) or laparotomy (control group). All women in the case group underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy using an intrauterine manipulator.Measurements and Main ResultsThe positive predictive value of frozen section analysis for myometrial infiltration, histotype, and grade of differentiation was 97.2%, 100%, and 97.2%, respectively. The correct diagnosis rate was of 85.7%. The accuracy of frozen section analysis, rate of correct diagnosis, and rate of tumor vascular invasion did not seem to be significantly modified by systematic use of an intrauterine manipulator for total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with total abdominal hysterectomy in early-stage endometrial cancer staging.ConclusionsFrozen section analysis of early-stage endometrial cancer is highly accurate, and systematic use of an intrauterine manipulator does not represent a bias for correct evaluation of the specimen.