Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
3959467 | Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology | 2010 | 5 Pages |
Study ObjectiveTo compare surgical and immediate postoperative results of robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy vs myomectomy via laparotomy in patients with 3 myomas or fewer.DesignCase-control (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).SettingUniversity hospital.PatientsSeventy-five women who had undergone robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy were compared with patients who had undergone myomectomy via laparotomy.InterventionsMedical records were reviewed for surgical and postoperative variables. Both groups had 3 myomas or fewer confirmed at preoperative magnetic resonance imaging or final pathology report.Measurements and Main ResultsNo significant differences were observed between patients insofar as preoperative demographic data. There was a significant increase in mean duration of surgery for robotic-assisted myomectomy. There was a significant decrease in blood loss, change in hematocrit concentration on postoperative day 1, length of stay, number of days to regular diet, and febrile morbidity in robotic-assisted myomectomies. There were no significant differences in operative or postoperative complications.ConclusionAlthough robotic-assisted myomectomy took substantially longer, most of the other variables improved in comparison with similar procedures performed via laparotomy.