Computer-assisted embryo selection: a benefit in the evaluation of embryo quality?

Embryo selection is based on embryo developmental and morphological characteristics. Standard embryo evaluation has some disadvantages. New technology using multilevel images combined with a computer-assisted scoring system (CASS) has the potential to overcome these disadvantages. The aim of this study was to compare the value of a computer-assisted scoring system (CASS) versus a standard scoring system (SSS) in predicting implantation and live birth. This prospective study included 3185 embryos obtained during 502 IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles with single-embryo transfer on day 3. Embryos were evaluated with two scoring systems: SSS and CASS. Logistic regression analyses were performed using implantation and live birth as outcomes. According to multiple regression analysis, implantation was influenced by number and size of blastomeres on day 3 using CASS and by all embryo parameters on day 3 using SSS. Combined analysis of both scoring systems revealed that implantation was affected by number and size of blastomeres using CASS and by the degree of embryo fragmentation using SSS. Using live birth as outcome, only the number of blastomeres on day 3, evaluated by SSS and CASS, was predictive. Prediction of implantation and live birth may be superior using CASS when compared with SSS.Embryo selection is currently based on embryo developmental and morphological characteristics of an embryo using a standard scoring system. This evaluation system is limited by a number of disadvantages. New technology using multilevel images combined with a computer-assisted scoring system has the potential to overcome these disadvantages. The aim of this study was to compare the value of such computer-assisted scoring system versus a standard scoring system in predicting implantation and live birth rate. This study included 3185 embryos obtained during 502 IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles with single-embryo transfer on day 3. All the embryos were evaluated with two types of scoring systems: a standard scoring system and a computer-assisted scoring system. According to the statistical analysis, the implantation of an embryo was influenced by the number and size of blastomeres on day 3 when evaluated with the computer-assisted scoring system, and by all embryo parameters on day 3 using the standard scoring system. Combined analysis of both scoring systems revealed that implantation was affected by number and size of blastomeres using the computer-assisted scoring system and by the degree of embryo fragmentation using the standard scoring system. Live birth was influenced by the number of blastomeres on day 3 evaluated by both scoring systems. Prediction of embryo implantation and live birth was superior using the computer-assisted scoring system. In conclusion, a computer-assisted scoring system may be superior to a standard scoring system in the prediction of implantation and live birth.