Artificial versus stimulated cycles for endometrial preparation prior to frozen–thawed embryo transfer

The objective of this study was to compare the implantation rate, pregnancy rate and endometrial thickness of frozen–thawed embryo transfers using endometrial preparation with either an artificial cycle or stimulated cycle. This was a prospective randomized trial at a single academic IVF centre. Seventy-seven patients undergoing artificial cycles received oral oestradiol; patients with endometrium < 7 mm on day 9–10 were switched to vaginal oestradiol. Eighty-six patients undergoing stimulated cycles received recombinant FSH followed by human gonadotrophin hormone injection. Vaginal progesterone was begun 2 or 3 days prior to embryo transfer. There was no difference in implantation rate (8.5% versus 7.3%), pregnancy rate (16% versus 13%), cancellation rate (both 23%) or endometrium thickness (8.7 ± 1.1 mm versus 8.7 ± 1.0 mm) between artificial and stimulated cycles. Stimulated cycles had a higher incidence of thin endometrium (27% versus 5%, P < 0.01). In artificial cycles, patients switched to vaginal oestradiol had improved pregnancy rate (31%) versus patients who received oral oestradiol alone (13%) (P = 0.05). It is concluded that artificial and stimulated cycles produce comparable pregnancy rates, implantation rates, cancellation rates and endometrial thickness, although stimulated cycles have a higher incidence of thin endometrium. Vaginal oestradiol supplementation improved implantation rates.