Dual-energy CT angiography of pelvic and lower extremity arteries: dual-energy bone subtraction versus manual bone subtraction

AimTo analyse the effect of dual-energy bone subtraction (DEBS) on the image quality of peripheral computed tomography (CT) angiograms.Materials and methodsTwenty patients underwent dual-energy CT angiography of the pelvic and lower extremity arteries using commercially available equipment. Two different methods of image processing were employed for each CT angiographic dataset: (1) DEBS, and (2) manual bone subtraction (MBS). Effects on vessel visibility and artificial vessel alterations were compared.ResultsBone removal, and the resultant visibility of vessel segments, were significantly better with DEBS than with MBS (p = 0.011). The overall frequency of vessel-related alterations was lower in MBS compared with DEBS (p = 0.001). Specifically, in the 249 vessel segments with calcified plaques, MBS generated fewer vessel alterations than DEBS (p < 0.001). In the 309 vessel segments without calcified plaques, there was no difference in vessel alteration between the two techniques (p = 0.22).ConclusionDEBS facilitates bone removal in peripheral CT angiography, but generates more vessel alterations, particularly in the presence of calcified plaque.