Percutaneous abscess drainage in the UK: A national survey and single centre study

AIMTo establish the current practice for management of radiologically placed percutaneous drains for abdominal sepsis in the UK and prospectively study the management of radiologically placed drains at our institution.METHODA questionnaire on the management of radiologically placed drains was sent to all radiology departments on a Royal College of Radiologists database. We prospectively followed all drains placed by our radiology department for drainage of abdominal collections, over a 7-month period.RESULTSA total of 210 questionnaires were sent for the national survey, of these 117 were returned (55.7%). The majority of departments (70.5%) reported that after drain insertion the clinical team took over daily management. Just over 5% of departments either formally managed the drain or obtained final outcome data. From October 2003 to April 2004 we followed 63 consecutive drains placed in 45 patients, for abdominal sepsis. Thirty-nine drains (61.9%) were curative and 17 (26.9%) drains failed. Three drains (4.8%) were placed for palliation, and four drains (6.4%) were placed in order to temporise prior to surgery. Forty-three (68.3%) drains had a successful primary outcome: success after secondary percutaneous abscess drainage (PAD) improved to 46 (73.0%) drains. Two (3%) major complications occurred.CONCLUSIONSThe current approach in the UK to management of radiologically placed drains differs significantly from that practised in the USA. The most common type of support offered by radiology departments in the UK is of informal advice and follow-up, with the clinical team managing the patient's drain. Observations in our hospital highlighted problems relating to drain management that may impact on the success of PAD. We suggest that more formal radiological support after PAD would improve communication and potentially improve outcomes.