Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
3988591 Gaceta Mexicana de Oncología 2016 8 Pages PDF
Abstract

ResumenIntroducciónLos tumores limítrofes de ovario son neoplasias con proliferación celular y atipia nuclear sin invasión al estroma, pero con capacidad de desarrollar implantes tumorales y de presentar recurrencias hasta 5 o más años después de su diagnóstico.ObjetivoMostrar los aspectos clínico-patológicos, de diagnóstico y tratamiento de estas lesiones a través de la revisión de una casuística institucional.Material y métodosAnálisis retrospectivo de expedientes de tumores limítrofes manejados con criterio oncológico en el Servicio de Oncología del Hospital General de México «Dr. Eduardo Liceaga» durante un lapso de 5 años.ResultadosSe trataron 50 de 502 pacientes con cáncer epitelial (9.9%) con edad promedio de 45.8 años y manifestaciones clínicas predominantes de dolor y aumento de volumen. Treinta y nueve casos (78.0%) fueron serosos, 10 (20.0%) mucinosos; y uno (2.0%) endometroide. Cuarenta y uno (82%) se clasificaron en estadio I; y 9 (18%) en estadios II y III. El 71% de los estadios I y 88.8% de los II y III elevaron el Ca-125 (p > 0.05).En 18/33 pacientes (54.5%) se obtuvo el diagnóstico correcto mediante estudio transoperatorio. Se llevaron a cabo 37 cirugías radicales (74%) y 13 estadificadoras conservadoras (26%). Solo un caso de 9 (11.1%) con reestadificación mostró subetapificación y uno de 30 linfadenectomías (3.3%) presentó afectación ganglionar. Doce casos (24%) mostraron implantes tumorales. En esta serie no hubo recurrencias tumorales durante un seguimiento promedio de 32.6 meses.ConclusionesEl manejo con criterio oncológico de estos tumores corrobora que la mayor parte corresponde al estadio I y ayuda a disminuir las cifras de recurrencias. Resulta controversial el papel de la linfadenectomía.

IntroductionBorderline ovarian tumors are tumors with cell proliferation and nuclear atypia without stromal invasion, but with the ability to develop tumor implants, and recurrence probability up to 5 or more years after diagnosis.ObjectiveTo show the clinical and pathological aspects of diagnosis and treatment of these tumors through an institutional review of casuistry.MethodsRetrospective analysis of clinical records from borderline ovarian tumors managed with oncologic criteria in the Department of Oncology at Hospital General de Mexico “Dr. Eduardo Liceaga”, for a period of 5 years.ResultsWe treated 50 cases of 502 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (9.9%); with a mean age of 45.8 years; the predominant clinical manifestations were pain and increased abdominal volume. Thirty-nine patients (78.0%) had serous tumors, 10 (20.0%) mucinous tumors; and 1 (2.0%) endometrioid tumor. Forty-one (82%) were classified in stage I; and 9 (18%) with stage II and III. Seventy one % of stage I and 88.8% of the stage II and III, had elevated Ca-125 (p > .05).In 18 of 33 patients (54.5%) the correct diagnosis was obtained by intraoperative study. Thirty seven patients of the study were treated with radical surgery (74%) and 13, with conservative (but comprehensive) surgical staging (26%). Only one case of nine (11.1%) with restaging showed substratification; and 1 out of 30 lymphadenectomies (3.3%) had lymph node involvement. Twelve cases (24%) showed tumor implants. In this series, there was no tumor recurrence during a mean follow-up of 32.6 months.ConclusionsManagement with oncologic criteria of these tumors corroborated that the majority corresponds to Stage I, and helps reduce the numbers of recurrences. The role of lymphadenectomy is still controversial.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Oncology
Authors
, , ,