Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
3991215 Journal of Thoracic Oncology 2011 9 Pages PDF
Abstract

IntroductionSingle-agent gemcitabine is a standard of care for elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, but novel therapies are needed for this patient population.MethodsWe performed a noncomparative randomized phase II trial of gemcitabine, erlotinib, or the combination in elderly patients (age ≥70 years) with stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer. Patients were randomized to arms: A (gemcitabine 1200 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 21 days), B (erlotinib 150 mg daily), or C (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 21 days and erlotinib 100 mg daily). Arms B and C were considered investigational; the primary objective was 6-month progression-free survival.ResultsBetween March 2006 and May 2010, 146 eligible patients received protocol therapy. The majority of the patients (82%) had stage IV disease, 64% reported adenocarcinoma histology, 90% reported current or previous tobacco use, and 28% had a performance status of 2. The 6-month progression-free survival rate observed in arms A, B, and C was 22% (95% confidence interval [CI] 11–35), 24% (95% CI 13–36), and 25% (95% CI 15–38), respectively; the median overall survival observed was 6.8 months (95% CI 4.8–8.5), 5.8 months (95% CI 3.0–8.3), and 5.6 months (95% CI 3.5–8.4), respectively. The rate of grade ≥3 hematological and nonhematological toxicity observed was similar in all three arms. The best overall health-related quality of life response did not differ between treatment arms.ConclusionsErlotinib or erlotinib and gemcitabine do not warrant further investigation in an unselected elderly patient population.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Oncology
Authors
, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,