Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
3991731 Journal of Thoracic Oncology 2006 9 Pages PDF
Abstract

PurposePatient-assessed health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) scores, together with demographic and clinical factors in stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, are important prognostic factors for survival and may be helpful in determining thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) strategy.MethodsIn a previously published randomized trial, 301 patients were treated with different palliative radiotherapy schedules, comparing short-term hypofractionated TRT (arm A: 17 Gy/2 fractions [n = 105]) with more protracted TRT (arm B: 42 Gy/15 fractions [n = 104]); arm C: 50 Gy/25 fractions [n = 92]). Baseline HRQOL, demographic, and clinical data were available for all patients. All possible prognostic factors from univariate analysis were entered into the Cox multivariate regression model to identify variables of independent prognostic relevance.ResultsOverall survival was similar, whereas long-term survival was restricted to higher-dose radiotherapy with 3-year survival rates of 1, 8, and 6% (p = 0.40) and 5-year survival rates of 0, 4, and 3% (p = 0.12) in arms A, B, and C, respectively. In univariate analysis, Karnofsky performance status, use of analgesics, and weight loss were highly significant non-HRQOL factors (p < 0.001), and physical function, appetite loss, cough, and pain were the most powerful HRQOL factors (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, appetite loss appeared as the most powerful independent prognostic indicator. In the group of patients treated with protracted fractionation (n = 196), the 2-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates in patients with no appetite loss (n = 95) were 22% (21/95), 12% (11/95), and 8% (8/95) compared with 3% (3/101), 1% (1/101), and 1% (1/101) in patients with appetite loss present at baseline (n = 101).ConclusionIn addition to performance status and weight loss, patient-reported appetite loss should be assessed in stage III NSCLC patients before administrating TRT; such assessment is a valuable tool for selecting patients to normofractionated or lower-dose hypofractionated palliative TRT.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Oncology
Authors
, , , , ,