Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
3992334 Journal of Thoracic Oncology 2008 8 Pages PDF
Abstract

IntroductionThis randomized phase II study investigated the efficacy and safety of a new taxane, larotaxel (XRP9881), in combination with either cisplatin or gemcitabine in the first-line treatment of patients with nonirradiable stage IIIB or stage IV non-small cell lung cancer to select the combination having the most promising antitumor activity.MethodsPatients received either larotaxel (50 mg/m2) as a 1-hour infusion, followed by a 1-hour infusion of cisplatin (75 mg/m2), every 3 weeks (arm A), or gemcitabine (800 mg/m2) as a 30 minute infusion, on days 1 and 8, and larotaxel (60 mg/m2) as a 1-hour infusion, on day 8 (following gemcitabine), every 3 weeks (arm B). The primary end point was the objective response rate (per-protocol population).ResultsThirty-two patients were randomized to arm A and 30 to arm B. The response rate was higher in arm A compared with arm B in both the per-protocol (26.7% versus 18.2%) and intention-to-treat (28.1% versus 13.3%) populations. In the intention-to-treat population, median progression-free survival for arm A versus arm B was 4.7 versus 3.3 months and median overall survival was 8.6 versus 7.3 months, respectively. Fifty percent of patients in arm A and 66.7% in arm B experienced at least one National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria grade 3/4 adverse event and grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 46.9% and 41.4% of patients, respectively.ConclusionsBoth larotaxel combinations were effective and manageable, however all measured efficacy parameters (response rate, progression free survival, and survival) seemed to favor the combination with cisplatin.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Oncology
Authors
, , , , , , , , , , ,