Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
4000759 | Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations | 2010 | 5 Pages |
Abstract
Our institutional experience and relevant literature on surgical margin rates with laparoscopic and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy are summarized. Differences in surgical margins were assessed between patients undergoing open or robotic-assisted prostatectomy by experienced surgeons, and placed in context with a review of the literature. Surgical margins and location were similar between patients undergoing open or robotic prostatectomy. Pathologic stage, baseline prostate-specific antigen, and Gleason score all impacted the risk of a positive surgical margin. Experienced surgeons can achieve comparable outcomes in terms of surgical margins. Disease burden plays a significant role in positive surgical margins.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Oncology
Authors
Alon Z. Weizer, Seth Strope, David P. Wood Jr.,