Accuracy of IOL calculations in children: A comparison of immersion versus contact A-scan biometery

PurposeTo evaluate the accuracy of pediatric IOL calculations performed under general anesthesia by using immersion A-scan biometry and to compare the results to those obtained using contact A-scan biometry.MethodsA retrospective review of 203 consecutive cases of pediatric cataract extraction with primary IOL implantation within the capsular bag; mean patient age was 5.52 ± 4.19 years (range, 18 days to 18 years). Axial length measurements were performed with the contact A-scan biometry in 138 eyes, whereas immersion technique biometry was used in the remaining consecutive 65 eyes. Preoperative predictive target refraction was compared with the refractive result obtained at the 2-month postoperative visit.ResultsThe mean of the absolute value lens prediction error for all eyes was 1.08 ± 0.93 D from the desired postoperative refractive result. Lens prediction error for the contact A-scan subgroup was 1.11 ± 0.90 D, whereas the immersion A-scan subgroup was less at 1.03 ± 0.98 D. This result was not statistically significant (p = 0.6442). Statistically significant correlations were found between increased lens prediction error and age at time of surgery or corneal curvature.ConclusionsThis retrospective, noncomparative pilot study showed no significant difference in IOL prediction error when comparing the postoperative refractive results obtained with immersion versus contact A-scan biometry in pediatric IOL calculations.