| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4017303 | Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery | 2011 | 6 Pages |
PurposeTo present an economic-analysis comparison of simultaneous and sequential bilateral cataract surgery.SettingHelsinki University Eye Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.DesignEconomic analysis.MethodsEffects were estimated from data in a study in which patients were randomized to have bilateral cataract surgery on the same day (study group) or sequentially (control group). The main clinical outcomes were corrected distance visual acuity, refraction, complications, Visual Function Index-7 (VF-7) scores, and patient-rated satisfaction with vision. Health-care costs of surgeries and preoperative and postoperative visits were estimated, including the cost of staff, equipment, material, floor space, overhead, and complications. The data were obtained from staff measurements, questionnaires, internal hospital records, and accountancy. Non-health-care costs of travel, home care, and time were estimated based on questionnaires from a random subset of patients. The main economic outcome measures were cost per VF-7 score unit change and cost per patient in simultaneous versus sequential surgery.ResultsThe study comprised 520 patients (241 patients included non-health-care and time cost analyses). Surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction were similar in both groups. Simultaneous cataract surgery saved 449 Euros (€) per patient in health-care costs and €739 when travel and paid home-care costs were included. The savings added up to €849 per patient when the cost of lost working time was included.ConclusionCompared with sequential bilateral cataract surgery, simultaneous bilateral cataract surgery provided comparable clinical outcomes with substantial savings in health-care and non-health-care–related costs.Financial DisclosureNo author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
