Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
4018439 | Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery | 2011 | 5 Pages |
PurposeTo evaluate the possible side effects and potential protection 5 years after implantation of an intraocular lens (IOL) with a blue-light filter (yellow tinted).SettingOphthalmology Department, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.DesignProspective randomized clinical study.MethodsPatients with bilateral visually significant cataract randomly received an ultraviolet (UV) and blue light–filtering IOL (Acrysof Natural SN60AT) in 1 eye and an acrylic UV light–filtering only IOL (Acrysof SA60AT) in the fellow eye. The primary outcome measures were contrast sensitivity, color vision, and macular findings 5 years after surgery.ResultsThe study enrolled 60 eyes of 30 patients. There were no significant clinical or optical coherence tomography findings in terms of age-related macular degeneration in any eye. There were no statistically significant differences in central macular thickness between the 2 IOL groups (P=.712). There were also no significant between-group differences under photopic or scotopic conditions at any spatial frequency studied. No statistically significant differences in the color discrimination test were found between the 2 IOL groups (P=.674).ConclusionsAfter 5 years, there were no significant differences in color perception, scotopic contrast sensitivity, or photopic contrast sensitivity between the blue light–filtering (yellow-tinted) IOL and the IOL with a UV-light filter only (untinted). The potential advantage of the tinted IOL in providing protection to macular cells remains unclear.Financial DisclosureNo author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.