Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
4021729 | Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery | 2006 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
Small forward movement of the 1CU IOL was seen with accommodation and increased following pilocarpine, compared to the posterior movement of the MA30 IOL. The amount of the IOL shift was not sufficient to provide useful near vision, but the difference suggests that the engineering concept behind the 1CU IOL is valid.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Ophthalmology
Authors
Joanne MRCOphth, David FRCOphth, Catherine MRCOphth, Hari MRCOphth, John PhD,