Comparison of Penetrating Keratoplasty Performed with a Femtosecond Laser Zig-Zag Incision versus Conventional Blade Trephination

PurposeTo evaluate visual outcomes and astigmatism in patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty (PK) with 2 different incision techniques.DesignRetrospective comparison of a consecutive surgical series.ParticipantsFifty-seven consecutive patients who underwent PK at the University of California, Irvine, academic referral practice.MethodsA comparison of 49 eyes of 43 patients that underwent femtosecond laser zig-zag incision pattern PK versus 17 eyes of 14 patients that underwent conventional Barron suction trephination PK performed contemporaneously. All PKs were closed with an identical, 24-bite running nylon suture technique.Main Outcome MeasuresTopographically determined astigmatism, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), and recovery of full visual potential.ResultsThe postoperative follow-up ranged from 1 to 12 months. There was a significant difference in average astigmatism between the groups at postoperative month 1 (P = 0.013) and 3 (P = 0.018). By month 3, the average astigmatism was 3 diopters (D) in the zig-zag group and 4.46 D in the conventional group. Of the patients with normal macular and optic nerve function (nZZ = 32; ncon = 14), a significant difference in BSCVA was seen at month 1 (P = 0.0003) and month 3 (P = 0.006) with 81% of the zig-zag group versus 45% of the conventional group achieving BSCVA of ≥20/40 by month 3 (P = 0.03).ConclusionsThe femtosecond laser generated zig-zag–shaped incision results in a more rapid recovery of BSCVA and induces less astigmatism compared with conventional blade trephination PK.Financial Disclosure(s)Proprietary commercial disclosure may be found after the references.