Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
4029354 | Ophthalmology | 2008 | 13 Pages |
Abstract
There is substantial level II and level III evidence that WFG LASIK is safe and effective for the correction of primary myopia or primary myopia and astigmatism and that there is a high level of patient satisfaction. Microkeratome and flap-related complications are not common but can occur with WFG LASIK, just as with conventional LASIK. The WFG procedure seems to have similar or better refractive accuracy and uncorrected visual acuity outcomes compared with conventional LASIK. Likewise, there is evidence of improved contrast sensitivity and fewer visual symptoms, such as glare and halos at night, compared with conventional LASIK. Even though the procedure is designed to measure and treat both lower- and higher-order aberrations (HOAs), the latter are generally increased after WFG LASIK. The reasons for the increase in HOA are likely multifactorial, but the increase typically is less than that induced by conventional LASIK. No long-term assessment of WFG LASIK was possible because of the relatively short follow-up (12 months or fewer) of most of the studies reviewed.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Ophthalmology
Authors
Steven C. MD, Ayad A. MD, David MD, PhD, Brian S. MD, William B. MD, David J. MD, Parag A. MD, Alan MD, MS,