Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
4029993 Ophthalmology 2007 6 Pages PDF
Abstract
Reproducibility is better for central subfield thickness measurements than for center point measurements, and variability is less with retinal thickness when expressed as a percent change than when expressed as an absolute change. A change in central subfield thickness exceeding 11% is likely to be real. Scans with an SD of the center point of ≥10.0% are less reproducible and should be viewed with caution when assessing the validity of an observed change in retinal thickness in patients with DME.
Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Ophthalmology
Authors
,