Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
4033752 Vision Research 2013 10 Pages PDF
Abstract

•Standard 2nd-order vision model implies low 2nd-order high frequency sensitivity.•Broadly tuned 1st-order channels improve high-frequency sensitivity.•Cross-carrier adaptation study supports broadly tuned 1st-stage filters.•Lowpass CSF at low 1st-order contrast suggests pooling standard 1st- order channels.

The processing of texture patterns has been characterized by a model that first filters the image to isolate one texture component, then applies a rectifying nonlinearity that converts texture variation into intensity variation, and finally processes the resulting pattern with mechanisms similar to those used in processing luminance-defined images (spatial-frequency- and orientation-tuned filters). This model, known as FRF for filter rectify filter, has the appeal of explaining sensitivity to second-order patterns in terms of mechanisms known to exist for processing first-order patterns. This model implies an unexpected interaction between the first and second stages of filtering; if the first-stage filter consists of narrowband mechanisms tuned to detect the carrier texture, then sensitivity to high-frequency texture modulations should be much lower than is observed in humans. We propose that the human visual system must pool over first-order channels tuned to a wide range of spatial frequencies and orientations to achieve texture demodulation, and provide psychophysical evidence for pooling in a cross-carrier adaptation experiment and in an experiment that measures modulation contrast sensitivity at very low first-order contrast.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Neuroscience Sensory Systems
Authors
, ,