Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
4042085 Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery 2015 7 Pages PDF
Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to compare the tensile strength of hamstring grafts of varying combined pull-through diameters within the clinically relevant range of 6 to 9 mm.MethodsWe tested 44 non-irradiated allograft hamstring grafts (11 per group). Combined looped semitendinosus and gracilis grafts were allocated to the 6-, 7-, 8-, or 9-mm group based on the smallest-diameter lumen that the graft could be “pulled through” using a surgical sizing instrument. Testing was performed on an Instron materials testing machine (Instron, Norwood, MA). Samples were secured with cryoclamps, prestressed, and pulled to failure at a rate of 10% gauge length per second.ResultsThe mean load to failure was 2,359 ± 474 N, 3,263 ± 677 N, 3,908 ± 556 N, and 4,360 ± 606 N for the 6-, 7-, 8-, and 9-mm grafts, respectively. Minimum failure loads were as low as 1,567 N, 2,288 N, 2,874 N, and 3,720 N for each group, respectively. There were statistically significant differences between the 6- and 7-mm, 6- and 8-mm, 6- and 9-mm, and 7- and 9-mm groups (P = .01).ConclusionsStatistically different increasing tensile strength was seen as graft diameter increased. Significant variability exists in the strength of multi-stranded hamstring allografts within the diameter range of 6 to 9 mm that often falls well below the commonly accepted value of 4,000 N for a hamstring graft.Clinical RelevanceRecent evidence suggests a higher early failure rate of hamstring autografts in subsets of patients with graft diameters of 8 mm or less. This study may increase awareness that hamstring grafts may not be nearly as strong as previously appreciated and that increasing tendon diameters by 1 to 2 mm may dramatically affect graft strength. These data may be helpful in preoperative discussions regarding variable hamstring size, strength, and potential intraoperative augmentation options.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Authors
, , , , , ,