Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
4043249 | Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery | 2013 | 8 Pages |
PurposeThis study aims to provide an overview of both the open and endoscopic procedures used to treat posterior ankle impingement, as well as an analysis, evaluation, and comparison of their outcomes.MethodsA systematic literature search of the Medline, Embase (Classic), and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) databases and the Cochrane Database of Clinical and Randomized Controlled Trials was performed. Quality of included studies was assessed by use of the Downs and Black scale.ResultsAfter we reviewed 783 studies, 16 trials met the inclusion criteria. Of these trials, 6 reported on open surgical techniques and 10 evaluated endoscopic techniques. The complication rate (15.9% v 7.2%) and time to return to full activity (16.0 weeks v 11.3 weeks) differed between the 2 groups, both favoring endoscopic surgery.ConclusionsAlthough the level of evidence of the included studies is relatively low, it can be concluded that the endoscopic technique is superior to the open procedure.Level of EvidenceLevel IV, systematic review of Level IV studies.