Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
4044117 Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery 2012 11 Pages PDF
Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the midterm outcomes of patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement treated arthroscopically.MethodsOutcomes were measured with the Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS), visual analog scale pain scores, and satisfaction levels preoperatively; at 6 weeks and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively; and at final follow-up. Two hundred one procedures were available for final assessment with a minimum follow-up of 36 months (mean, 46 months). Ninety-nine percent of hips had a preoperative Tönnis grade of 1 or less.ResultsThe NAHS significantly improved from a mean of 56.1 to 78.2 (P < .001). Visual analog scale pain scores improved from a mean of 6.8 to 2.7 (P < .001). Preoperative to postoperative satisfaction levels improved from 0.5% to 75% of procedures. Twelve patients required hip arthroplasty during the follow-up period and had a higher incidence of grade 4 acetabular chondral defects versus those without arthroplasty (P < .03). Patients with pincer resections had significantly poorer results versus the remainder of the cohort (P < .01).ConclusionsWe have shown satisfactory results using a validated hip scoring system, showing improvement in NAHS, pain scores, and satisfaction levels in a large cohort of patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement followed up for a mean of 46 months. The results have shown improvement and stability throughout a range of 36 to 70 months' follow-up. There was no difference in preoperative to postoperative NAHS between age groups. There was a larger percentage of grade 4 acetabular chondral defects in those patients who needed conversion to hip arthroplasty. Patients with associated pincer pathology had poorer results after acetabular rim resection.Level of EvidenceLevel IV, therapeutic case series.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Authors
, , , ,