| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4045472 | Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery | 2010 | 6 Pages |
PurposeThe primary objective of this study was to evaluate the difference in graft pullout forces, stiffness, and failure mode of double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction of the tibial insertion by use of a single tunnel compared with a double-tunnel technique with interference screw fixation.MethodsACL reconstruction on the tibial side was performed on 40 fresh-frozen porcine knees (mean bone mineral density of 0.64 g/cm2 measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scan), randomly assigned to the single- or double-tunnel group. Interference screw fixation of the soft-tissue graft was used for both types of tibial reconstruction. Maximum failure load, stiffness, and failure mode were recorded.ResultsThere was no significant difference in maximum failure load between the single-tunnel group (400 ± 26 N) and double-tunnel group (440 ± 20 N). Stiffness of the tibial tunnel complex was significantly higher in the double-tunnel group (76 ± 3 N/mm) than in the single-tunnel group (62 ± 4 N/mm) (P = .013). All but 2 grafts (38 of 40) failed by slippage of the tendon past the interference screw.ConclusionsThere was significantly stiffer fixation of the tibial double-tunnel ACL complex when compared with the single tunnel. Our study did not show a different failure mode for the double-tunnel reconstruction compared with the single-tunnel reconstruction.Clinical RelevanceThis study shows a biomechanical advantage with no potential deleterious side effects for fixation of the ACL with a double-tunnel technique on the tibial side.
