Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
4050017 Clinical Biomechanics 2016 5 Pages PDF
Abstract

•A novel approach to predict the trunk muscle geometry was proposed.•Gender, body mass, and height were found as the most important predictors.•The regression model showed a good model fidelity compared to previous reports.•This model will be useful to develop curved muscle paths in biomechanical models.

BackgroundAccurate geometry of the trunk musculature is essential for reliably estimating spinal loads in biomechanical models. Currently, many models employ straight muscle path assumptions that yield far less accurate tissue loads, particularly in extreme postures. Precise muscle moment-arms and physiological cross-sectional areas are important when incorporating curved muscle geometry in biomechanical models. The objective of this study was to develop a predictive model of moment arms and physiological cross-sectional areas of trunk musculature at multiple levels in the thoracic/lumbar spine as a function of anthropometric measures.MethodsBased on magnetic resonance imaging data from thirty subjects (10 male and 20 female) reported in a previous study, a polynomial regression analysis was conducted to estimate the muscle moment-arms and physiological cross-sectional areas of trunk muscles through thoracic/lumbar spine as a function of vertebral level, gender, age, height, and body mass.FindingsGender, body mass, and height were the best predictors of muscle moment-arms and physiological cross-sectional areas. The predictability of muscle parameters tended to be higher for erector spinae than other muscles. Most muscles showed a curved muscle path along the thoracic/lumbar spine.InterpretationThe polynomial regression model of the muscle geometry in this study generally showed good predictability compared to previous reports. The predictive model in this study will be useful to develop personalized biomechanical models that incorporate curved trunk muscle geometries.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Authors
, , , , , , ,