Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
4061096 The Journal of Arthroplasty 2013 6 Pages PDF
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the dislocation rates, functional outcomes, and radiographic results between large- and small-diameter femoral head components. A total of 225 patients (248-hips) who received total hip arthroplasties with large-diameter components (36 mm or greater) were compared to 501 patients (559-hips) who received smaller diameter components (less than 36 mm). Rates of dislocation and revision, Harris hip score, radiographic findings, and complications were compared between the groups. At a mean follow-up of approximately 5 years, a significantly higher rate of dislocation was noted in the small-diameter group (10 of 559) compared to the large-diameter group (0 of 248). The overall implant survivorship, mean Harris hip scores, complication rates, and radiographic outcomes were similar for the two groups. The authors believe that large-diameter components significantly reduced the risk of dislocation in susceptible patients, while preserving good to excellent functional outcomes.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Authors
, , , , ,