Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
4061362 | The Journal of Arthroplasty | 2010 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
Distally fixed modular implants have seen a recent increase in use, to manage proximal femoral bone loss often encountered during revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Forty-three distally fixed modular stems implanted at our institution between 1999 and 2006 were clinically and radiographically reviewed. These patients had either a minimum 2-year follow-up (average, 2.4 years; range, 2-5.6 years) or failure (ie, explant or rerevision required). Eleven stems subsided, and 4 were rerevised (n = 4), for a rate of 9.3%. All revised stems were radiographically undersized, emphasizing the importance of the technique. Although being a valuable option in revision THA, these stems are not free of complications. The high rate of subsidence encountered in our early experience shows that there is a learning curve. This complication is preventable by avoiding undersizing.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Authors
Preetesh D. MD, Alison K. MS, Trevor G. MD, Karim A. MD, Viktor E. MD, Wael K. MD,