Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
4064055 | The Journal of Arthroplasty | 2008 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
Contemporary unicompartmental knee arthroplasty has shown resurgence in use partly because of studies reporting excellent long-term survivorship. Both fixed-bearing as well as mobile-bearing designs have shown comparable results. Fixed-bearing designs, in particular, implants with metal-backed tibial components have shown more consistent long-term survival, whereas fixed bearings with an all-polyethylene tibial component have had mixed results. Similar to the all-polyethylene tibial component designs, mobile-bearing designs have demonstrated mixed results. One concern with mobile bearings is the high rate of complete tibial radiolucent lines. The keys to long-term survival of both fixed and mobile-bearing designs in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty are patient selection, surgical technique, and surgical experience.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Authors
Peter M. MD, Daniel A. MD,