Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
4064667 | Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology | 2014 | 7 Pages |
The aim of this exploratory study was to verify whether the evaluation of quadriceps muscle weakness is influenced by the testing modality (isometric vs. isokinetic vs. isoinertial) and by the calculation method (within-subject vs. between-subject comparisons) in patients 4–8 months after total knee arthroplasty (TKA, n = 29) and total hip arthroplasty (THA, n = 30), and in healthy controls (n = 19). Maximal quadriceps strength was evaluated as (1) the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) torque during an isometric contraction, (2) the peak torque during an isokinetic contraction, and (3) the one repetition maximum (1-RM) load during an isoinertial contraction. Muscle weakness was calculated as the difference between the involved and the uninvolved side (within-subject comparison) and as the difference between the involved side of patients and controls (between-subject comparison). Muscle weakness estimates were not significantly affected by the calculation method (within-subject vs. between-subject; P > 0.05), whereas a significant main effect of testing modality (P < 0.05) was observed. Isometric MVC torque provided smaller weakness estimates than isokinetic peak torque (P = 0.06) and isoinertial 1-RM load (P = 0.008), and the clinical occurrence of weakness (proportion of patients with large strength deficits) was also lower for MVC torque. These results have important implications for the evaluation of quadriceps muscle weakness in TKA and THA patients 4–8 months after surgery.