Safety and Efficacy of Operative Versus Nonsurgical Management of Distal Radius Fractures in Elderly Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PurposeTo assess the safety and efficacy of operative versus nonsurgical treatment of distal radius fractures in elderly patients.MethodsWe comprehensively searched the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for studies that satisfied predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Outcomes of interest included pain level, grip strength, wrist range of motion, wrist functional assessment, radiographic parameters, and complications; we compared these using continuous measurements. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess operative versus nonsurgical procedures in patients aged 60 years and older.ResultsTwo randomized controlled trials and 6 retrospective studies were included. Meta-analysis did not detect statistically significant differences in pooled data for pain level, functional assessment, and wrist range of motion between the operative and nonsurgical groups. Grip strength was significantly greater in the operative group. The incidence of major complications requiring surgery and that of tendon injury were significantly higher in the operative group. Radiographic outcomes including volar tilt, radial inclination, and ulnar variance were significantly better in the operative group. Considerable heterogeneity was present in all studies and adversely affected the precision of the meta-analysis.ConclusionsThe current literature does not support the theory that operative management can provide better clinical outcomes for elderly patients with distal radius fractures. Although operative management can offer better radiographic outcomes and grip strength than can nonsurgical treatment, the risk of complications requiring surgical treatment is greater. Thus, indications for operative fixation should be considered carefully in the treatment of elderly patients.Type of study/level of evidenceTherapeutic III.