| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4076380 | Journal de Traumatologie du Sport | 2016 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
The main asset of this study resided in the highlighting of minor differences as no way significant between the two machines tested on the chosen population. The “TENS” shows similar results as the “VeinoPlus Sport” even if a slight preference for the latter was expressed. Both devices permitted an equal or even better performance in the second drill in comparison to the first drill.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Authors
M. God, C. Le Goff, F. Evrard, J.-F. Kaux,