Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
4092420 | SAS Journal | 2010 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
Data from our register showed results similar to the RCT, but a register cannot fully replace an RCT study when evaluating a new treatment option if the RCT has narrower selection than just the diagnosis. In this RCT comparing TDR with posterior fusion, the normal exclusion criteria for TDR were used. These were not registered, so the register could not prevent a possible selection bias, which might also be caused by the nonresponders.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Authors
Svante MD, PhD, Hans MD, PhD,