Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
4094327 | Seminars in Arthroplasty | 2006 | 5 Pages |
Abstract
The excellent in vivo human wear data out to 5.5 years using highly cross-linked polyethylene against metal heads in total hip arthroplasty matches the data for ceramic-on-ceramic wear. The melted polyethylene does not oxidize. Large heads can be used. Therefore, decisions regarding the choice of this couple versus a ceramic couple reside in other issues. In all five categories of these other issues, namely familiarity, forgiveness, adaptability, absence of specific disadvantages of ceramic-on-ceramic, and cost, polyethylene appears to have important advantages.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Authors
William H. Harris,