| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4094850 | Seminars in Spine Surgery | 2011 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
Minimally invasive surgery of the spine (MISS) has become an increasingly popular buzz word in the spine community. What truly constitutes MISS is not entirely clear. We propose that MISS procedures be judged on the basis of the degree to which they spare additional anatomical structures compared with the existing standard as long as the safety and efficacy of the procedure are preserved. In this work we explore this structure-sparing perspective and the anticipated benefits on patient outcomes, against the notion that small incisions or technology dictate MISS.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Authors
Josef E. Gorek, Kevin W. Rolfe, Cary Idler,