Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
4118534 | Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery | 2014 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
The PBOT was shown to be reliable both in terms of its internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Comparison to the DAS24 demonstrated the PBOT to be valid. However, the cohorts were small and responsiveness was not tested. This needs to be tested in further larger validation studies, ideally, with comparison to functional scales such as the SF-36 or other validated massive weight loss body contouring PROMs; such as the Body Q.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Otorhinolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery
Authors
Nada Al-Hadithy, Richard Welbourn, Hosakere Aditya, Ken Stewart, Mark Soldin,