| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4121039 | Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery | 2010 | 13 Pages |
Abstract
The effect of diverse secondary procedures was measured computing a mean-percent-gain score. Statistical differences between treatment groups means were tested by the t-test and one-way ANOVA. Two-thirds of the corrective and ancillary techniques utilized granted significantly higher mean-scores post-secondary surgery. A comparison of pre- and post-operative data found valuable improvements in all three facial zones after secondary surgery. In conclusion, inherent to dynamic procedures is the need for secondary revisions. Secondary surgery builds in the potential of reanimation surgery, effectively augmenting functional faculties and aesthesis.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Otorhinolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery
Authors
Julia K. Terzis, Fatima S. Olivares,
