Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
4132883 Human Pathology 2015 9 Pages PDF
Abstract

SummaryDespite the controversies, estrogen receptor–negative/progesterone receptor–positive (ER−/PR+) breast cancers have a reported incidence of 1% to 4%. These tumors are less well defined, and it is unclear whether ER−/PR+ represents a distinct subtype. Thus, we analyzed 5374 consecutive breast cancers to characterize the clinicopathological features of this underrecognized subset of tumors. The ER−/PR+ tumors, constituting 2.3% of the total, were mostly high grade and significantly seen in younger patients and African American women when compared with the ER+/PR+ and ER+/PR− groups, but similar to that of ER−/PR− phenotype (P < .0001). A significantly prolonged relapse-free survival (RFS) was associated with the ER+/PR+ subtype when compared with the ER+/PR− (P = .0002) or ER−/PR+ (P = .0004) tumors, whereas all 3 groups showed a superior outcome to that of the ER−/PR− phenotype. In the subset of patients receiving endocrine therapy, those with ER+/PR+ tumors had a significantly prolonged RFS (P = .001) and disease-specific survival (P = .005) when compared with the group with an ER+/PR− phenotype, but did not significantly differ from those with ER−/PR+ tumors. No significant survival advantage was found between the ER+/PR− and ER−/PR+ tumors in any group of patients analyzed. Furthermore, a higher PR expression was associated with a favorable RFS and disease-specific survival in the patients with ER−/PR+ tumors. Therefore, the ER−/PR+ tumors demonstrate a similar, if not higher than, response rate to endocrine therapy when compared with the ER+/PR− tumors and thus are important to identify. Routine PR testing remains necessary in assisting clinical decision making in the pursuit of precision medicine.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Pathology and Medical Technology
Authors
, , , , ,