Stratification of Children by Medical Complexity

ObjectiveTo stratify children using available software, Clinical Risk Groups (CRGs), in a tertiary children's hospital, Seattle Children's Hospital (SCH), and a state's Medicaid claims data, Washington State (WSM), into 3 condition groups: complex chronic disease (C-CD); noncomplex chronic disease (NC-CD), and nonchronic disease (NC).MethodsA panel of pediatricians developed consensus definitions for children with C-CD, NC-CD, and NC. Using electronic medical record review and expert consensus, a gold standard population of 700 children was identified and placed into 1 the 3 groups: 350 C-CD, 100 NC-CD, and 250 NC. CRGs v1.9 stratified the 700 children into the condition groups using 3 years of WSM and SCH encounter data (2008–2010). WSM data included encounters/claims for all sites of care. SCH data included only inpatient, emergency department, and day surgery claims.ResultsA total of 678 of 700 children identified in SCH data were matched in WSM data. CRGs demonstrated good to excellent specificity in correctly classifying all 3 groups in SCH and WSM data; C-CD in SCH (94.3%) and in WSM (91.1%); NC-CD in SCH (88.2%) and in WSM (83.7%); and NC in SCH (84.9%) and in WSM (94.6%). There was good to excellent sensitivity for C-CD in SCH (75.4%) and in WSM (82.1%) and for NC in SCH (98.4%) and in WSM (81.1%). CRGs demonstrated poor sensitivity for NC-CD in SCH (31.0%) and WSM (58.0%). Reasons for poor sensitivity in NC-CD are explored.ConclusionsCRGs can be used to stratify children receiving care at a tertiary care hospital according to complexity in both hospital and Medicaid administrative data. This method will enhance reporting of health-related outcome data.