Nasolacrimal Duct Probing under Topical Anesthesia for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Taiwan

BackgroundTo report the success rates of office probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) among children of different age groups in Taiwan.MethodsIn this single-center, retrospective study, 564 eyes of 477 patients under the age of 5 years diagnosed with congenital NLDO were treated in a stepwise manner between 2001 and 2013. For infants aged < 6 months, treatment with massage and observation was suggested, followed by deferred probing under topical anesthesia if symptoms persisted. However, in cases of severe infection, immediate probing was suggested. In children aged > 6 months, office probing was usually highly recommended. Those with probing failures received either a second probing or silicone intubation. Treatment success was defined as anatomic patency by immediate irrigation after probing and absence of epiphora or mucous discharge at the follow-up visit.ResultsPrimary probing was successful in 457 of 564 eyes (success rate: 81%). The success rate of primary probing was negatively correlated with increasing age: 90.1% (163/181), 79.6% (164/206), 76.8% (73/95), 73.5% (36/49), 75% (18/24), and 33% (3/9) for the age groups of 0 to <6 months, 6 to <12 months, 12 to <18 months, 18 to <24 months, 24 to <36 months, and 36–60 months, respectively (p < 0.001, Fisher's exact test). The second probing was successful in 52 of 81 eyes. In total, probing was successful in 509 of 564 eyes (success rate: 90.2%).ConclusionOffice probing is safe and effective for treating congenital NLDO. The success rate of primary probing decreases significantly with age.