| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4181483 | L'Encéphale | 2016 | 9 Pages | 
Abstract
												We think, with others, that the definition of the mixed depression by the DSM-5 is not clinically relevant and misses important information about the concept. Clinicians can be attentive to the identification of mixed character in depression, even if DSM-5 criteria are not fully met. Unfortunately, the DSM-5 definition could undermine research efforts for a better understanding of epidemiology, phenomenology and therapeutics of mixed depression. We propose and discuss alternative solutions for defining mixed depression, such as the absence of exclusion of “overlapping” symptoms, a more insighted phenomenology, or a dimensional approach.
											Keywords
												
											Related Topics
												
													Health Sciences
													Medicine and Dentistry
													Psychiatry and Mental Health
												
											Authors
												S. Weibel, G. Bertschy, 
											