| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4195366 | Annals of Medicine and Surgery | 2015 | 7 Pages |
•No such comparative study before.•Surgery for huge HCCs is safe as small ones.•Even 1 mm surgical margin is good enough.
Background/purposeCurrent treatment options for HCC≥10 cm (huge HCC) are limited. Otherwise, the margin status is known as a prognostic factor. Our aim was to determine the safety, effectiveness, and risk factors for overall survival and disease-free survival for these patients.MethodsA total of 211 consecutive patients from 2000/08 to 2010/12 were enrolled. Characteristics of patients, tumors, and treatment were compared between the huge group (HCCs; ≥10 cm, n = 23; 11%) and those with smaller group (HCC; <10 cm n = 188; 89%). Disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and risk factors were analyzed.ResultsMedian follow up was 37 months. Patients with huge HCC were more likely to be symptomatic, positive for preoperative portal vein thrombosis, longer surgical time, more blood loss and transfusions, and significantly shorter median OS and DFS. Both groups had similar postoperative mortality and morbidity rates. In the huge HCC, multivariate analysis identified two significant determinants of DFS (preoperative portal vein thrombosis on imaging and tumor-free margin less than 1 mm) and two significant determinants of OS (age over 80 and preoperative portal vein thrombosis). Even with positive margins, it still had no impact on OS. For DFS, 1 mm free margins appeared to be adequate.ConclusionTumor-free margin is an independent risk factor for recurrence but has no impact on OS. Surgical margin >1 mm is adequate in patients with tumors ≥10 cm. Postoperative close follow up, especially of distant metastasis, and appropriate treatment of recurrence by a multidisciplinary approach may improve prognosis.
