| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4218795 | Academic Radiology | 2012 | 8 Pages | 
Abstract
												The intrinsic value of imaging (the value of imaging unrelated to treatment) has not been appropriately defined or incorporated in the existing cost-utility literature, which could be due to a lack of evidence on the issue. Thus, more research is needed on metrics for a more comprehensive evaluation of diagnostic imaging. Similarly, the incorporation of variations in imaging tests accuracy, inconclusive results and associated risks has lacked uniformity in the cost-utility literature. Acknowledgment of these characteristics in future cost-utility publications will enhance their value and provide results that more closely resemble routine clinical practice.
											Related Topics
												
													Health Sciences
													Medicine and Dentistry
													Radiology and Imaging
												
											Authors
												Hansel J. MD, Chi H. MS, MPH, Meera MD, Robert J. MD, Peter J. ScD, 
											