Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
4221786 | Clinical Imaging | 2011 | 5 Pages |
Abstract
We compared observer performance of digital mammography among hard-copy readings and soft-copy readings using 3-megapixel (3M) and 5-megapixel (5M) liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors. Five experienced radiologists assessed 80 mammograms of 40 cancers and 40 benign lesions. There were no significant differences among the average Az of three modalities and among the κ values for intra- and interobserver agreement. The soft-copy reading using the 3M LCD monitor took a slightly longer time, although there were no significant differences.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Radiology and Imaging
Authors
Takeshi Kamitani, Hidetake Yabuuchi, Yoshio Matsuo, Taro Setoguchi, Shuji Sakai, Takashi Okafuji, Shunya Sunami, Masamitsu Hatakenaka, Nobuhide Ishii, Makoto Kubo, Eriko Tokunaga, Hidetaka Yamamoto, Hiroshi Honda,