Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
4221818 Clinical Imaging 2014 5 Pages PDF
Abstract

Our objective was to compare plaque volumes of multidetector computed tomographic images reconstructed using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR), model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR), and filtered back projection (FBP). We reviewed 25 patients for a total of 50 extremities imaged on the same scanner. Calcified plaque FBP volume (3468.2±2634.8 mm3) was higher than ASIR (2548.1±2166.5 mm3). Calcified plaque FBP volume was higher than MBIR (mean=2345.7±1935.4 mm3). Our findings suggest that traditional FBP methods overestimate disease compared to newer reconstruction methods.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Radiology and Imaging
Authors
, , ,