Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
4221818 | Clinical Imaging | 2014 | 5 Pages |
Abstract
Our objective was to compare plaque volumes of multidetector computed tomographic images reconstructed using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR), model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR), and filtered back projection (FBP). We reviewed 25 patients for a total of 50 extremities imaged on the same scanner. Calcified plaque FBP volume (3468.2±2634.8 mm3) was higher than ASIR (2548.1±2166.5 mm3). Calcified plaque FBP volume was higher than MBIR (mean=2345.7±1935.4 mm3). Our findings suggest that traditional FBP methods overestimate disease compared to newer reconstruction methods.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Radiology and Imaging
Authors
Vivek V. Patil, Lawrence N. Tanenbaum, Robert A. Lookstein,