| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4222048 | Clinical Imaging | 2012 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
ObjectiveThe objective was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of conventional radiography and ultrasonography (US) for the diagnosis of suspected bone fractures.MethodEighty-six patients were assessed using conventional radiography and US on the affected bone district.ResultsRadiographic and sonographic findings were concordant in 93% of cases. In one case, US suggested a fracture not seen on radiographic assessment. Ultrasonography showed a sensitivity of 0.94 and a specificity of 0.92.ConclusionIn clinical practice, US could become the first diagnostic approach.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Radiology and Imaging
Authors
Valeria Beltrame, Roberto Stramare, Nicola Rebellato, Federico Angelini, Anna Chiara Frigo, Leopoldo Rubaltelli,