Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
4222239 | Clinical Imaging | 2009 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
PurposeTo compare ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) determination of diffuse liver steatosis.Materials and methodsQuantification of liver steatosis on ultrasound, CT, and MRI was correlated with histopathology in 67 patients.ResultsOpposed-phase MRI demonstrated the highest correlation with steatosis (0.68 and 0.69, P<.01; intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.93). Spearman's correlation (and intraclass correlation) coefficients were lowest for ultrasound [0.54, 0.33 (0.40)] and enhanced CT [0.33, 0.39 (0.97)].ConclusionOpposed-phase MRI demonstrated best overall performance for determining steatosis.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Radiology and Imaging
Authors
Aliya Qayyum, Daryl M. Chen, Richard S. Breiman, Antonio C. Westphalen, Benjamin M. Yeh, Kirk D. Jones, Ying Lu, Fergus V. Coakley, Peter W. Callen,