Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
4222925 | Clinical Imaging | 2009 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
PurposeThis study aimed to determine the reliability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) without luminal contrast medium versus MR enteroclysis for evaluating small bowel pathology, to compare MRI and MRE findings per observer, and to compare these findings with those of an expert reader in order to determine the influence of luminal contrast medium on morphological evaluations.ConclusionThe use of luminal contrast medium bowel improves reliability for measuring bowel wall thickness and for the diagnosis and grading of obstruction when evaluating the small bowel.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Radiology and Imaging
Authors
Bart M. Wiarda, Karin Horsthuis, Annette C. Dobben, Remy W.F. Geenen, Martin A. Heitbrink, Willem Moolenaar, Ernst J. Kuipers, Jaap Stoker,