Real-time ultrasound elastography: Does it improve B-mode ultrasound characterization of solid breast lesions?

IntroductionElastography is a non-invasive medical imaging technique that detects tumors based on their stiffness (elasticity). Strain images display the relative stiffness of lesions compared with the stiffness of surrounding tissue as cancerous tumors tend to be many times stiffer than the normal tissue, which “gives” under compression. An image in which different degrees of stiffness show as different shades of light and dark is called an elastogram.PurposeTo prospectively evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the real-time sonoelastography as compared with B-mode US for distinguishing between benign and malignant solid breast masses. The density of the glandular breast tissue was taken in consideration in addition to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) categories of the lesions, with biopsy results as the reference standard.MethodsA total of 216 candidate solid lesions (123 benign and 93 malignant) in 188 patients were examined with 2-dimensional ultrasonography, elastosonography and mammography (for 147 patients). The lesions were classified according to the density of the glandular breast tissue into low density group (D1) and a high density group (D2) and were categorized with the BIRADS score. Elastographic images were assigned an elasticity score of 1 to 5 (1–3, benign; 4 and 5, malignant) according to the Multi-Center Team of Study and the strain ratios of the lesions were measured. Concordance between the imaging findings and histopathologic results was documented. Statistical analysis was performed and sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values for both elastography and conventional sonography were calculated.ResultsElastography showed less sensitivity but higher specificity than conventional sonography in the differentiation of benign from malignant solid lesions: B-mode sonography had sensitivity of 85.1%, specificity of 93.9%, a positive predictive value of 92.5% and a negative predictive value of 87.8%, compared with the sensitivity of 80.1%, specificity of 97.1%, a positive predictive value of 96.8% and a negative predictive value of 82.1% for elastography. Elastography was superior to B-mode US in diagnosing solid lesions in the low density group (D1) (96.6% vs. 92.4% specificity) and less in the dense glandular tissue (97.8% vs. 95.9% specificity).ConclusionsReal-time sonoelastography is an useful technique for the characterization of benign and malignant solid lesions as it increases the diagnostic specificity comparable to B-mode ultrasound, particularly in both ACR 1 and 2, thus reducing the false-positive rate.