Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
4226898 European Journal of Radiology 2009 6 Pages PDF
Abstract

PurposeTo compare accuracy of non-enhanced CT (NECT) (no oral or IV contrast) and enhanced CT (ECT) (IV enhanced only) to diagnose small bowel obstruction and evaluate reviewer's experience impact.Materials and methodsNinety-nine adult patients underwent 105 NECT and ECT (6 patients had 2 examinations) on a four-detector CT. An abdominal radiologist, an abdominal imaging fellow, a second-year radiology resident retrospectively reviewed NECTs and ECTs separately and independently blinded to outcome. Discrepancy of diameter of proximal and distal small bowel ± a transition was considered indication of mechanical bowel obstruction. Reference standard was surgery in 26 and chart review in 79.ResultsMechanical obstruction was present in 56% (59/105). The average sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive and accuracy values for NECT were 88.1% (CI: 80–96%), 77% (CI: 65–89%), 83.0% (CI: 72–95%), 83% (CI: 74–92%), and 83% (CI: 76–90%) with no significant difference between three reviewers. The corresponding numbers for ECT were 87.6% (CI: 79–96%), 75% (CI: 63–88%), 82.6.0% (CI: 71–94%), 82.1% (CI: 73–92%), and 82% (CI: 75–90%) (p > 0.5). Area under curve (AUC) of ROC curves of three reviewers did not show significant statistical difference (p > 0.5).ConclusionsNECT and ECT have comparable accuracy to diagnose mechanical small bowel obstruction and can be interpreted by reviewers with different levels of expertise.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Radiology and Imaging
Authors
, , , , , , ,