Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
4228238 European Journal of Radiology 2008 10 Pages PDF
Abstract

The high spatial resolution and the lack of ionizing radiation, makes magnetic resonance imaging the method of choice for imaging most spinal pathology, especially if associated with neurological symptoms. However, due to the high sensitivity of MR imaging, careful correlation between imaging findings and clinical findings is important to ensure appropriate treatment. Substituting radiographic evaluations for rapid MRI in the primary care setting may offer little additional benefit to patients. It may even increase the costs of care but the decisions about the use of imaging depend on judgments concerning whether the small observed improvement in outcome justifies additional cost.Because the presence of an abscess is a major factor in deciding between conservative and surgical treatment, MRI plays an essential role in the decision-making process concerning the treatment of spondylodiscitis. MR is also the method of choice for quantitative evaluation of bone marrow in lymphoma patients when a crucial therapeutic decision has to be made or for the qualitative evaluation of the spinal cord if compression is suspected in primary spinal malignancy or metastatic disease.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Radiology and Imaging
Authors
, ,