| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4228292 | European Journal of Radiology | 2007 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
The incidence of early adverse reactions was similar with the two non-ionic contrast agents. Although bradycardia was slightly more frequent using iopamidol 340, nausea was reported more commonly 24Â h after the procedure in patients receiving Iomeron 350 (Iomeron®). We conclude that there were only minor clinical differences between these agents; both are safe and well tolerated.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Radiology and Imaging
Authors
Kunadian Vijayalakshmi, Babu Kunadian, Robert A. Wright, James A. Hall, Michael J. Stewart, Adrian Davies, Andrew Sutton, Mark A. de Belder,
